> produce food with less human energy and fossil fuels, and chemicals, and cutting down forests
It requires less input, less labor, less land --- why isn't it already trashing the market by simply being much cheaper?
It requires less input, less labor, less land --- why isn't it already trashing the market by simply being much cheaper?
An imperfect analogy is that legalizing cannabis requires less labor & more funds than keeping it illegal, yet we're still hesitating to do that in many countries.
Humans (and thus most markets) have other incentives than simply having things for cheaper.