Space Jam 2
spacejam2.com
spacejam2.com
> You are welcome to buy our jam or you can also buy our website.
> We are independent and not related to any third parties.
Domain squatting cleverly disguised as a small home-business selling jam? Neat.
Seems the domain was registered 1702 days ago (~5 years) so the owners have been sitting on this for some time.
Look at the text in https://www.spacejam2.com/press-kit
> JAM COMPANY TROLLS WARNER BROS BY NABBING 'SPACEJAM2.COM' URL AND OFFERING IT FOR $1M
>"The idea behind the trolling is a collaboration between advertising creative Hunter Fine and commercial film director Peter Marquis, who have a history of creating viral pop culture."
It's trying to play it straight to be able to legitimately claim it's a 'Space Jam Recipe #2' website, but the videos and copy are full of little snide commentary about how the website is perfect for someone's movie business, which makes it seem pretty clear that they're knowingly taking a WB trademark for their site name...
ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy [1] states that one of the qualifiers for an applicable domain dispute is if the domain is being used in bad faith, and this clearly is.
[1] https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/policy-2012-02-25-en
I think this is one of those times where it's not about money.
“ JAM COMPANY TROLLS WARNER BROS BY NABBING 'SPACEJAM2.COM' URL AND OFFERING IT FOR $1M”
...
The idea behind the trolling is a collaboration between advertising creative Hunter Fine and commercial film director Peter Marquis, who have a history of creating viral pop culture. “
This is like if as a "troll" I left a car blocking your driveway, not caring if it got towed because it was a fake car I specifically designed over the course of years to leave in your driveway.
There’s also a bit of art to trolling, too, which is again part of the fun.
Not sure why this is so surprising.
For example, calling in fake pizza orders. Very low-effort for the troll, yet high-yield rewards in trolling the pizza vendor.
On the other hand, expanding vastly more money and resources than will cost the corporation in question to neutralize the troll is not successful trolling, it is a failure.
Why would you cheer on people making the internet a worse place? We would all be better off without squatters, not the other way around...
Wouldn't this run afoul of cyber-squatting regulations when you're straight up admitting to it?
Just send me the equivalent amount of that in Bitcoin first :^)
I wonder what their jam tastes like and if it's actually profitable.
I'd say we have to see if there's any other connection to the original film other than the name and Looney Tunes.
It's a common tactic used very widely. See Jurassic World (Jurassic Park), Star Wars: The Force Awakens (SW: A New Hope), X-Men First Class (X-Men 1/2/3), the new Jumanji films etc etc.
Looks like it isn't really a reboot, but it's also not a continuation of the story so I wouldn't call it a "sequel" either.
I wonder if it will pay off.
Is redirecting e-mail from your domain hard or expensive or something?