I'm trying to point out how the 1% aren't somehow hoarding all the cash, which was the implication the parent made.
Congrats on knowing the phrase "straw man" though, even if its not applicable in this case.
Congrats on knowing the phrase "straw man" though, even if its not applicable in this case.
-- InternetHippo on Twitter
Of course there are reasonable arguments that shareholders are treated preferentially to labour in our economy and that that's as bad thing, but the basic premise of "the wealthy people have all the stuff so let's take their stuff" is just class warfare, not a reasonable argument.
> not a reasonable argument
It's only "not a reasonable argument" if you mentally substitute how cartoonishly huge, rich, authoritarian, etc. Bezos and Amazon actually are with a mom and pop shop or a guy who owns a single factory.