Argentine president positive for coronavirus after vaccination early this year
reuters.com
reuters.com
Emphasis mine.
Entirely expected events that are just a minor scare to the person they're happening to anyway are not newsworthy. Report the statistics, not the anecdotes.
We then got a bunch of Sputnik vaccines, but instead of vaccinating old people, they decided to give it between friends and politicians (20 years olds). It was a big mess.
The fact the president is positive, it’s not big deal, Sputnik seems to be a very good vaccine, but with 90-95 efficacy. The only big thing could be if he got a variant/mutation (Brazil, UK). It’s still unknown at the moment if Sputnik is effective against those mutations.
The most important vaccine statistic is the ( I think still current) 0 deaths in the vaccinated groups.
But we figured that out by collecting statistics. Not by publishing anecdotes.
And as for the comment you're replying to:
> The most important vaccine statistic is the ( I think still current) 0 deaths in the vaccinated groups.
If the "official" stats show 0 deaths after vaccination, be very suspicious! People die all the time, roughly 1% of the population per year. If you vaccinate a non-trivial number of people, some will die by coincidence anyway. If those coincidental deaths aren't being reported, you're going to have a much harder time making sure they are in fact just the expected number of coincidences.
Hmmmm