Scientists Need to Admit What They Got Wrong About Covid
wired.com
wired.com
As far as I can tell, the answer comes about halfway through the article: "Less than a year later, I must admit, at the expense of my ego, I was wrong." Is there anything to this article than looking for back pats for having done the right thing?
I mean, yes, you're a good cat and a pretty cat. Props. Well done.
But was anybody under the impression that epidemiologists and public health experts and virologists and basically everybody weren't about to spend the next decade dissecting everything that happened over the last 18 months?
Or are we looking for some specific public self-flagellation? To what end? Will it actually increase the public confidence in science?
tell you not to wear a mask, and then later tell you if you don't wear a mask you are a Nazi incel who is literally killing grannies...
tell you Trump didn't do enough about a vaccine, then when by some miracle it gets made way before projections, say it's suspect because Trump promoted it or had some hand in it...
tell you it's not safe to send your kids to school. then when scientists say it is, they say "LOL j/k we don't wanna go back to teaching your kids yet...
One could easily be forgiven for concluding it's more about the politics than the science.
The people that want these sorts of apologies are the ones that are looking for reasons to deny science. Those sorts of people simply never change, and will always look for reasons to disregard it.
So no. This wouldn't solve anything. It'd just make things worse.