Announcing new decision making procedures for Debian
lists.debian.org
lists.debian.org
That sounds like a terrible idea. People who post a hundred angry tirades are rarely the most insightful ones. Additionally, this gives weight to low-effort, low-value messages.
Obviously the secretary won't do a simple message count, but try to take substance and length into account, but it is the primary feature under evaluation, as it's written.
Substance and length are the second and third criteria. The list isn't ordered, so I don't think one could call a particular criterion "primary".