10 Myths surrounding solar energy | Hacker News Reader

10 Myths surrounding solar energy

solarplaza.com

11 pointsc4urself12 comments

Consider that the name of the site is Solarplaza. That said:

"But the payback time for the energy used to produce a solar panel is only one to two years. This means that in this time the panel generates the total amount of energy that has been used in its entire production. ... Other sources of energy have much longer payback times. Specifically, nuclear power plants have extremely long payback times - so long in fact that it is questionable whether all the power that generated during their lifetime is enough to pay for the energy used to build and disassemble them."

The bit about nuclear power plants is such nonsense I doubt the creditability of the rest of the article. The highest figure anywhere seems to be about 15 years, from Storm van Leeuwen http://www.stormsmith.nl/report20071013/partC.pdf

"In the summer, almost 10% of the household electricity in the south of Germany is generated by solar panels."

I don't know a great deal about solar energy, and I was led to believe that it was a bit hokey or inefficient, but that is a really impressive number. Cool!

Very enlightening. I did not know that solar panels can last from 25 to 40 years and that only in 1 to 2 years the produced energy pays off the carbon footprint needed for producing the panels.

This is why I want the public and the Governments to focus on pouring money into solar energy. The more attention it gets, the better the technology becomes and the price keeps dropping.

Thank you for the offer, but no.

Government should stay away from innovations. It's not where government is efficient at.

Well, I wasn't exactly implying that Government should be the biggest investor in these technologies, just that it should support it, and be its main priority going forward, like writing legislation to help it accelerate, etc.

Partial government involvement into innovation process would limit the damage, but it still would be damaging. Main priority of the government going forward should be limiting government expenses. That would be the best thing to encourage innovation.

Arguably it's not about doing the innovation, it's about accelerating its adoption.

How is that government business to decide what innovation to accelerate and which businesses/innovations to decelerate by taxing them (so funds would be available to accelerate cherry-picked innovations)?

What about the end of life of solar panels ? Did they manage to build recyclable ones ?

The answer is at the end of the article. The short answeris: that the solar industrie has processes to recycle 100% all the panels. I agree that it would be nice to know more about this, especially if the panels are really recycled - after all having processes is not a gjarantee that they are really applied.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com