The State of Ruby and Testing

Cool survey. I can't help but feel like pie charts are a terrible choice for portraying the information, because they imply that a respondent falls into one (and only one) category, and that all the slices add up to 100%. But I have a sneaking suspicion at least some of the people who have used 1.9.2 have also used 1.8.7 at some point. It'd be much more useful to hear the 90% of rubyists have tried 1.8.7, 85% have tried 1.9.2, etc.

Still, interesting data. I have learned that I am apparently a completely typical ruby user.

The pie charts don't really make any sense. For example, a single project can use Cucumber, Capybara, and RSpec, or none of them, or any combination. But in the article and its graphs they are presented as mutually exclusive options.

Separating the results into exclusive types (testing framework, browser integration framework, assertion macros, etc) would make a lot more sense. Or asking what tool is being used for a particular task (unit testing, integration testing, mocking/stubbing, assertion macros, etc).

Thanks rauljara and automach. I agree that the pie charts were probably not the best way to represent the data that was gathered. The questions could all take multiple answers, and I just summed the results to figure out how big of a piece of the pie each section would get. I made a quick edit to the post to clarify this. Thanks for taking the time to write that up, would appreciate any tips on how to better represent multiple answers per person per question.

Interesting survey but with some flaws. Ruby seems to be reduced to "Rails" and "web". While this certainly is the majority of code being written, it's still by far not the only code. Testing a library with capybara or selenium is just not possible. What about components and projects not using rails such as stand-alone daemons not even speaking http?

Nice survey but considering the limited data-set I'm not sure that's it's worth much.

Nice looking blog too.