It often boils down to the difficult task of discerning usability, intuitiveness, efficiency, and familiarity.
It often boils down to the difficult task of discerning usability, intuitiveness, efficiency, and familiarity.
For people accustomed to basic painting applications that provide all manner of circles, lines, and squares, it comes as a surprise that such tools are so buried in Photoshop or GIMP. But it turns out that drawing lines is simply not that important for most Photoshop users, since lines aren't that important for photo touchup, creating web graphics, or digital painting. For line-heavy art, there are better tools like Illustrator.
The problem is that GIMP is tasked with replacing both Photoshop and MS Paint on the Linux desktop. The hidden assumption is that since Photoshop is more "powerful", its feature set is adequate for typical MS Paint tasks... which is akin to assuming that Linux doesn't need a word processor because TeX is more powerful.