Booting people off core infrastructure (IaaS, colo, DNS) for reasons outside violation of law is a very slippery slope.
Booting people off core infrastructure (IaaS, colo, DNS) for reasons outside violation of law is a very slippery slope.
Gab/etc were accused of inciting violence, threats of physical harm, treason, etc. Reddit hasn't been accused of anything like that recently. Regardless of reality, infrastructure companies can make their own decisions on who is guilty and innocent.
You're right about accusations though. It seems that accusation alone is the key factor in whether you remain on AWS. Doesn't aspire confidence in AWS, does it.
https://wannabewonk.com/gab-and-free-speech-on-the-internet/
Probably it would be bad if the only speech allowed on popular web sites were speech that wasn't illegal anywhere, or illegal in only a few places.
If a specific country outside of where Reddit's servers are hosted has a problem with it, then they're welcome to ban it.