Thanks for illustrating so well the flamewar mode dang just mentionned.
--"The truth hurts"
You are just accusing people of refusing to see "the truth" which may be true but is not a argument about the validity of your thesis. That common rethoric. That also preemptively invalidates any counter-argument to your thesis because you know we're just deceived out of (fill in what you want).
-- "China released a deadly virus into the world."
China is not just one person. Even the Chinese gov is too big an entity to be given a single will and agency. This kind of abstraction is fine for everyday talk but must be discarded whenever you try to have an intelligent debate about something.
--" the Chinese people must accept their responsibility"
Wow, like if I am working as a coal miner in remote China I must be held accountable by "my" poor control of high tech labs? Come on I live in a "democracy" that has conducted nuclear trials in the Pacific nearby living places which I was totally against. Do I need to be held responsible?
-- "this crime"
Plain flamewar mode
--" it can provably meet western safety standards"
Did you even read the article?!