It was my understanding that 人 was “man” as in “person” (gender neutral) and not “man” as in male.
Is the author wrong or have I been applying modern PC standards to my language study?
It was my understanding that 人 was “man” as in “person” (gender neutral) and not “man” as in male.
Is the author wrong or have I been applying modern PC standards to my language study?
This is also consistent with my understanding. On a cultural note, many ppl call Westerners with PC leanings “白左” and view the PC movement as a bit ridiculous. So definitely don’t apply modern PC standards to China.
Maybe I am misreading the authors intent.
Putting aside whether "westerners with PC leanings" are "ridiculous" or not, it's hardly surprising that a country ruled by the CCP would have isolationist tendencies against international leftist movements that do not align with their own national interests. This power grab over language and definition is pretty evident in any "socialist" one party state that has existed.
Learn more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_9
I don't know if the combination (亻+圭) makes it gender specific, but as far as I know, many males also has 佳 in their names. I'd say the character is neutral, as long as the name is not 佳佳 which sounded too cute to be a male.
On the other hand, 蕊 is not gender neutral, because you don't call a man Flower and it's a different "Rui" from the one in my name.