Yes, every 3 months you need to revisit the API. It's good and bad. It means that if you're casually developing an app, this will consume a lot of time. Good because if forces you to update and keep your app relevant.
The real question we should be asking is, is churn adding value? I understand security updates but otherwise you can only improve the wheel so many times before it just becomes a waste of time (decreasing marginal returns). Software engineering _badly_ needs a concept of finished version and mature software. Often there is very little gained from a new framework every few months besides assuaging the egos of a new generation of developers.
It used to be like that. Back before the expectation of regular updates, in fact back before downloading updates off the internet was considered desirable or even feasible, when releasing a patch was a borderline embarrassing admission that we didn't get it right the first time, software shipped on CD and the version that shipped was understood to be the version installed on the vast, vast majority of customer systems, so it had better be a finished product or there were reputations on the line.
That's the opposite of good.
"Relevant" to whom? As long as the store is selling stuff, it's highly relevant to the buyer and seller.
That is the consumer being "good". There is nothing regarding the provider there which is good.
Never good.
I think the programming community largely agrees that indenting is good. If something is forcing you to do something that is good, then it definitely doesn't fall into the category of "never good."
I can't think of a single time in the nearly 10 years of using Python daily that made me want it to operate differently w.r.t. indenting.
Indenting as code always struck me as a horrible idea. Better than, say, type coercion... but still horrible.