This: “Generally, we want to hear from the public on whether or not they believe world leaders should be subject to the same rules as others on Twitter. And, should a world leader violate a rule, what type of enforcement action is appropriate.” is interesting.
The trouble is that, from Twitters perspective, they are the arbiter of how these interactions happen. Same for other major platforms.
It fails to address the question of whether private for profit corporations should be sole arbiters of the very substrate upon which we live and its rules.
Once the public and world governments think this through and fully game it out, I don’t think they’ll settle for the current status quo.
We’re already seeing internet shutdowns during elections in certain countries as a course and crude enforcement or regulatory action. I’d expect this to become more granular over time and to expand.