I'm trying to understand what people mean when they say "free speech platform".
It seems to be a get out of jail free card of sorts.
"Free speech" without any limits obviously doesn't work. Where are the limits of the parent comment? The devil is in the details.
Communication platforms in the US should adhere to the US constitution.
Isn't this where the entire problem is coming from? If this were a state run service, we know the answer and can apply it easily.
The confusion is coming entirely from it being something other than the state.
Or just on the basis of the one or more places the company itself is are incorporated? Will they shop around for communication laws the same way they do for taxes?
Facebook and Twitter run websites.