Both in isolation seem like laudable aims for the State, but lead us in opposing direction on this issue.
If they can’t, do they really own their computer?
If you don’t find that particular analogy salient surely you can think of others. How about just driving itself in cars that can go faster than the speed limit? The point is there are a multitude of things that provide benefit and also the opportunity for abuse, but rarely, virtually never, does this justify forgoing the benefit.
Yet, we don’t shut down every coal power plant because it’s useful just as we don’t ban cars etc. The benefits of assisted suicide are similarly significant and therefore worth it.
You're saying this as if we're talking about involuntary euthanasia.
Again, the law you're after here is preventing elder abuse. This is indeed something we should pay great attention to and try as best we can to carry out the wishes of the elderly. This abuse is no uncommon, even if it's comparatively benign by changing estate inheritance at the end of life for instance.
It really has nothing to do with assisted suicide.