Nevertheless, it seems likely that we will expand heavily within our own solar system before we ever reach another star. Proxima centauri is light years away, but mars, venus, the asteroids, and various rocky moons are within our grabby reach.
Nevertheless, it seems likely that we will expand heavily within our own solar system before we ever reach another star. Proxima centauri is light years away, but mars, venus, the asteroids, and various rocky moons are within our grabby reach.
And why would these life forms need to be biological? Do they need to have a limited lifespan? Could they send their consciousness in a droid? There seem to be options!
I think it's reasonable to assume that natural selection wouldn't favor that timescale.
For one, cosmic catastrophies - and resulting extinction events - would be much more often from the perspective of a "slow motion" lifeform.
On the other hand, from the perspective of "super fast living" creatures the universe would appear as a much more peaceful and friendly place.
That's certainly slow expansion, but it would be an expansion that in relatively short order would greatly exceed the biomass and biodiversity of Earth's biosphere, until it would be quite absurd that the whole thing would simultaneously decide to just stop one day. It would be slow but as difficult to stop as the biosphere is today.
This does depend on some sort of practical fusion tech, though.
Advancement seems to grow at exponential rates. Perhaps in a 1000 years we will not see c as an impediment.
When you're near the target, fertilize in an artificial womb, raise the kids with Khan Academy v999, and let them land the ship when they're ready.