We are just jabbing and negotiating the lines of personal freedom vs. common good.
I mean, common, what’s your comment about? What are you implying? That you’re morally superior to the OP because you grant him a hospital bed?
By the OPs admission he does not need a shot, won’t need a hospital bed (look up the odds for young healthy people yourself), and by getting vaccinated he would be taking a shot away from someone who does. In fact, by not getting the shot in lieu of someone who needs it more, he’s lowered the EV of hospitalization.
I’m not getting the shot until every last senior in Africa, L. America, and South East Asia has been offered one. And I’ll very well take my bed at a hospital when I need it.
By this I assume you think you are in the low risk of dying from COVID-19.
However, that does not mean you can't catch and spread the virus.
With that in mind you also need to consider those people you might come into contact with who are high risk, like your folks and your grandparents.
While you might well be fine, those around you might end up suffering the consequences of your actions.
This is because doctors are consistently silly about absence of evidence vs. evidence of absence. It's reasonable to assume that a vaccine will provide sterilizing immunity because they all do; that's what vaccines are for.
Public health agencies will always assume the worst right up until they see enough evidence. They also think you should cook steaks well done, but you don't have to do that either.
https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20210219/a-third-of-covid-su...
This is a novel virus that attacks our lungs and nervous system. We still know very little about long term effects, even if you aren't injury in the short term.
Also, not getting severely ill yourself doesn't mean someone else won't get sick from you. Please be careful.
6 months later she still isn't back to herself - gets out of breath, no sense of taste and insists her creative forces just don't fire the same way they used to
This is a fucking scary disease and to see so many people be blase about it is pathetic.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.10.14.20212555v...
> The five children with potential long COVID had a median age of 12 years (range 9–15) and four were girls. They had symptoms for 6–8 months after their clinical diagnoses of COVID‐19. None were hospitalised at diagnosis, but one was later admitted for peri‐myocarditis. All five children had fatigue, dyspnoea, heart palpitations or chest pain, and four had headaches, difficulties concentrating, muscle weakness, dizziness and sore throats. Some had improved after 6–8 months, but they all suffered from fatigue and none had fully returned to school.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apa.15673
Research into what is being referred to as "long COVID" is early but the signs are not good.
We're very hopeful that it might improve the situation.
Not anymore. https://www.deseret.com/u-s-world/2021/3/14/22327524/pfizer-...