> Records (...) are borrowed from Scala.
I think records already existed in FORTRAN and other languages like ALGOL-60. C has structs, too.
I think records already existed in FORTRAN and other languages like ALGOL-60. C has structs, too.
COBOL was a popular, very early language supporting hierarchical data of different types. This dates back to approximately 1960.
FORTRAN didn’t have records other than I/O “records” (at least for the first 20 years). ALGOL-60 didn’t have records. Algol-68 did have records, however Algol-68 wasn’t in very widespread use. I never had an opportunity to use it; compiler technology at that time wasn’t really ready for such a challenging language. Algol-68 may not have had widespread use, but a number of it’s features made their way into influential languages like C, Pascal, and Simula. These languages did have records.
As I recall, IBM’s PL/1 did have records, I seem to recall using them in the 70’s in a PL/1 program. PL/1 was kind of an amalgamation of FORTRAN and COBOL’s features.
In particular, I'm talking about the fact that Java doesn't really have "copy types" or "pass by copy" or whatever. So, sure, C has struct, Swift has struct, etc, but Java can't really model its version off of the way those work.