Hacker News Reader

Comment by saaaam | Hacker News Reader

Creator of the Zoom Escaper here... Sadly it relies on a web audio feature that's chrome only. Also too bad because I use firefox as my primary browser.

View on HN

Could you elaborate a little bit? Just curious about the technical side of creating this cool application.

I’m interesting in knowing as well which standard in particular is being used which only Chrome supports. I was under the impression that the Web Audio API[1] was fairly well supported cross all modern browsers.

1: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Audio_A...

It's the setSinkId function which let's you select an audio output (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/HTMLMediaEl...) but it looks like I was mistaken -- it should actually also work with Edge and Opera. Will update the message for clarity...

Looks like it is supported on Firefox, but disabled by default, and requires an about:config tweak: https://caniuse.com/?search=setSinkId

Its MDN doc (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/HTMLMediaEl...) shows it as a not-quite-finalized feature, but even so, seems odd to have a pref just for it.

Also of note that Firefox's Web Audio API implementation just isn't very good in general. It's my daily driver, but I won't run Airsonic in it, because after half an hour or so the music reliably starts glitching. Fine in every other client, so it's definitely a Firefox thing, and iO-808 [1] also calls it out in an alert if you go there in Firefox. (And also starts glitching out after a while, if you decide to ignore the alert and take your chances.)

Granted, a glitchy audio implementation might be just the thing for this use case...

[1] https://io808.com/

It should work with Brave too.

Thanks, every time I see such a message I wish it had an expandable paragraph telling me what prevents it working with Firefox.

Mentioing the info from kelnos' comment would be excellent.

Well done.

If someone wants to use this they should have no problem running in chrome.

Sure, morals are no problem to get over. But hey, what's the price of privacy to run some software?

Oh I’m sorry, did you pay for the development effort?

Of Chrome? I sure did. All of that information that Google has collected about me over the years without my say so has generated income for them.

If you ever used any of their services you agreed on a bunch of ToS.

Does that include all of those sites that include GA/GFonts/etc that I have zero control over? You don't have to use G/FB services to still be a money generator for them. To be a reader of this site and still not understand that, one must either be on ostrich or a new reader.

You do have control over, just don't load things from them. Google "no-script", "uBlock", etc.

Your biological and technological distinctiveness have already been absorbed by G if you seriously use the term Google in daily vernacular for search. tsk tsk. You are the borg.

Come on, it was a joke given the context of our conversation.

And you think a star trek borg reference wasn't?

My bad, I did not catch that.

Thanks for creating and for sharing with us! Disregard the negativity.

The negativity was probably meant for Chrome anyway.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com