What Happened to Pickup Trucks?
bloomberg.com
bloomberg.com
Except pickup trucks are also very popular among Latino buyers, and increasingly Black buyers as well: https://thecargossip.com/2020/10/17/ford-aims-f-series-push-... ("he F-Series is on pace to displace the Toyota Camry as the No. 1 nameplate among Black buyers this year, up from fourth place in 2019, according to IHS Markit registration data through June.... The Silverado is the second-bestselling vehicle among Hispanics, behind the Honda Civic.")
This brown guy's next vehicle will probably be a pickup truck. Not to impose "violent, authoritarian order" on an "unruly planet," but because I'd rather throw the kids' paddle boards into a truck bed than wrangle them into the interior of our 4Runner.
The real answer is: trucks are an in-group signal. And because it's not our group, it gets slandered as a masculinity crisis and a moral crime ("look how big and scary the grill is, it'll kill a biker!" "It's authoritarian!")
Is there any truth to these claims about the evils of trucks? Yes, the arguments are laid out well enough. But the real underlying reason this article was written is tribalism.
But the article indulges in classism as well as racial stereotyping of Black and Latino. Pickup trucks are popular among middle class white men in suburban, exurban, and rural areas. That makes them a legitimate object of derision for college professors. The fact that they’re also popular among Black and Latino men who live in those areas is an inconvenient fact that needs to be glossed over. They’re erased to preserve the narrative.
That erasure is frustrating because its those places where folks drive pickup trucks (suburban and exurban areas in sunbelt and southern states) that you actually find much of the growing Black and Latino middle class.
Many of these are from nearby farms I'm sure. But wow, they're just freakishly large. At a certain point you've got to wonder if they're basically heavy equipment that don't belong where normal autos belong.
I wonder where that line is. Can I build and drive the Canyonero even if it's two lanes wide?
As a note, 8'6" is also about the point at which spots are labled "compact cars only" but the requirements for that are extremely varied from state to state, and may include grandfathering clauses (as minimum parking spot ordinances are common, changing what counts as a "spot" could retroactively make a building no longer legally zoned)
I known I'll never need it. But golly do I want one.
I could see getting your kid a truck so if they get in accident they’re less likely to die, but when my oldest starts driving I’m gonna get her a retired police interceptor. Burly and relatively safe, but way cheaper.
Having said that, modern trucks have much better visibility than other body styles. The rear view mirrors are placed lower, greatly reducing blindspots beside the truck, and the backup cameras are higher off the ground, providing a better angle.
As for parking, fitting an American sports car in a spot is almost as much of a crap shoot as fitting a full sized truck.
As for the masculinity digs, well, it’s my wife’s truck. We’re both extremely concerned about climate change, but there is no reasonable alternative on the market. It’s not like the cybertruck is shipping or dealerships carry smaller engine trucks any more. Heck, they don’t even make small diesel trucks any more, and the EPA was blocking sales of the larger diesels the last time we were shopping. (Small diesel trucks had much lower CO2 emissions than gas trucks, but they have a less popular acceleration curve.)
There’s a lot of ignorant prejudice in this thread.
The reason the turning radius is relatively terrible is because the axels are so far apart (good weight distribution).
Some of the big trucks have rear wheels that steer too to help with that.
Also, have you driven a Ford C-MAX? It's very narrow for a four-door sedan/hatchback, which is great for getting into tight parking spots, except it has the worst turning radius ever.
There’s a lot to like about pickup trucks - and I say that as someone who has never owned one. This article just seems very biased and written from the perspective of a city dweller who looks down on all of suburban or rural America. It’s a tired form of self indulgent opinion journalism that we see regularly from urban activist blogs.
And the point of the article isn't "pick-ups suck" but looking at why the American pick-ups hit the 'roids.
Dodge has recently starting promoting the Ram here, and wow, the TV adverts are rather unsubtle about linking a "real truck" to masculinity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSqMjuMiOIU
Compare that to this one from Toyota for the 21 Hilux: