The power of imagination, and other parenting lessons from Calvin and Hobbes
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
I don't know what they were going to go on to say, and the fact that they were writing an article about this in the paper implies that they're clearly a big fan of the comic, but I just couldn't read past that sentence.
> I’ve read my fair share of parenting books, but I’d put “Calvin & Hobbes” at the top of the list of required reading. It reminds me to change my point of view.
The kids have read and reread the box set, so I feel like something is going ok with the whole knowledge transfer thing.
I read them fairly regularly even as a teenager so I was old enough to understand most of the jokes the first time I read them. But every so often I see one that I understand in a new light now that I'm a parent myself, in particular, the ones from Calvin's parent's point of view. And of course, some of the mild political commentary, and also the commentary on Waterson's own constant fights with Universal Press Syndicate over merchandising rights (or really his categoriacal refusal to do so) and the fight with newspapers for more space so that he didn't have to constrain the drawings to the rigid formats they demanded for easier editing.
I read the collection titled "Calvin and Hobbes: The Sunday Pages 1985-1995" in which Waterson discusses the context of these strips at length, as well as his artistic process. I highly recommend that one to anyone who is a fan.
Here're some strips that a six-year-old would barely understand:
https://www.intellectualtakeout.org/blog/12-times-calvin-and...
Very strangely, even the Internet Archive from 2016 has the same problem:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160609015414/https://www.intel...
There seems to be some sort of bug in Internet Archive, because they say there are two captures here:
https://web.archive.org/web/2019*/http://www.intellectualtak...
But viewing them tells me "The Wayback Machine has not archived that URL."
(on a completely different tone, and out of curiosity, James O'Barr would be in a close second place with The Crow... I leave the third place to Allan Moore or any other anyone sees more fit)
Dilbert has been criticized as not just portraying useless bosses, but also mostly useless employees who never try to improve anything:
( Believing Bill Watterson is the God-King, naturally ahahah)
Watterson is an artist, and he did it for the art, not just to make money. It lends a lot more credibility in some people's eyes.
It also shows that the strident anti-commercialism stance he takes in many of the comics isn’t just talk. He actually believes and lives it.
He didn't milk the cow!
He is a TRUE ARTIST!!!
I can't wait to share my entire set with my kids but I'm waiting for them to mature a bit more before getting them into it since a lot of the humor is lost in very young kids.