It is being argued that was not constitutional
You can check this for more info: https://melissacrouch.com/2021/02/07/the-illegality-of-myanm...
That professor is an expert on the constitution.
You can check this for more info: https://melissacrouch.com/2021/02/07/the-illegality-of-myanm...
That professor is an expert on the constitution.
It's entirely possible for there to be no such authority in place, without requiring "external intervention". In that case the people who live there might create such an authority, or they might not.
Eventually we might realize how all humans are harmed by subjugation to authority.
There is an elected representatives that have the people's support.
A branch of the government thinks its actions are constitutional, the people and the elected representatives don't.
Just because we are conditioned to favor outcomes that are more inclusive and democratic, doesn't mean it is the legally compliant option.
Just because a scholar and constitutional expert has an argument, doesn't mean it is the only interpretation.
So is there a court that can take the arguments from the scholar on behalf of the people, and the arguments from the military, and make a ruling?
There are no strong independent institutions.