Hacker News Reader

Comment by Keysh | Hacker News Reader

To be a bit pedantic: that’s only true for the Andromeda Galaxy (distance ~ 2,4 million light years), which is very hard to see with the naked eye. The Large and Small Magellanic Clouds are easy to see (from the Southern Hemisphere), but are only about 150,000-200,000 light years away.

View on HN

> the Andromeda Galaxy (distance ~ 2,4 million light years), which is very hard to see with the naked eye

That's due to light pollution in populated areas.

If you're out in the deep desert, it's not that hard to see. The night sky in the desert is a very, VERY different experience from what most people have seen from the city. It's like you're on a different planet.

I’ve seen it from fairly high in the Sierra Nevadas, far from any cities, and I still think it’s very faint.

Make sure your eyes are dark-adapted. I.e. you've spent at least 20 minutes in pitch darkness, with no sources of light other than the sky. And no Moon.

Altitude is not relevant in most cases.

You could also argue that "seeing" doesn't necessarily mean "perceiving". I can point my eyes to the exact spot where the Andromeda Galaxy is, or even other galaxies further away, and not actually perceive anything. But tint amount of photons from that galaxy still hit my eye. But that's being obtuse..

To be more pedantic, you are incorrect that this is only true for Andromeda. Several other galaxies are visible with the naked eye under excellent conditions, though they can certainly be challenging. These include M81 and M33.

Can you clarify? Aren’t we still observing an old state of any galaxy we see in the skies, simply due to the fact that light takes time to travel to us?

I believe OP's point is that which state you're seeing varies by distance. We see Andromeda as it was millions of years ago, but we see other stars as they were "only" hundreds of thousands of years ago. Closer = more recent picture, Farther = older snapshot.

Yes, exactly.

(The Triangulum Galaxy, M33, can sometimes be seen; at ~ 3 million light years, it’s further away and thus an even older “snapshot” than Andromeda.)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com