OVH CEO Octave Klaba apologizes and provides updates about SBG2
ovh.com
ovh.com
In this case nothing apart from the banner on the dashboard.
I'll want to know what is going on with a thing and find out "oh they mostly post that kind of news on twitter" or "oh this person uses instagram", or "that news goes out via email", or youtube ... or ... who knows where ...
Like guises come on, where am I supposed to get information when you're using like 8 different channels and not consistently...
https://help.ovhcloud.com/en-gb/faq/strasbourg-incident/?xto...
SBG1 and SBG4: we are planning to bring these datacentres and the network room onlinenext week.
SBG3: we are planning to bring this datacentre online in 1-2 weeks.
I'm not an OVH customer, are these building names? It seems a bit confusing that a datacentre doesn't correspond to an availability zone or is this typical at large scale?SBG2 basically burned to the ground. The fire also spread into SBG1 if I remember correctly: parts of SBG1 were destroyed but some parts are intact. SBG3 and 4 are also intact. Under the circumstances the entire complex is offline at the moment though, which is not surprising given the scale of the fire and the firefighter response. The photos reminded me of the WTC attack, which shut down lower Manhattan for months.
SBG2 was built like a vertical tunnel, a quadrangle of server rooms with a huge air shaft in the middle, intended to convection-cool the servers through the natural motion of the rising air through it as the air was warmed by the servers. In this case it may have resulted in something like a firestorm, where the fire maintained its own airflow through that column.
I'd be interested to know if there is any hope and/or intention in this situation to recover possibly-operable hard drives from the charred servers for data recovery purposes.
I couldn't believe the complaints about the audio in that mp4. I could understand him perfectly well except a few times his accent got in the way. Better audio wouldn't have mattered much.
I think it's fine for them to take some time to fix their infrastructure, but if they could let me know, I can easily work around it. Incoming email is kind of difficult to monitor and needs to work...
[edit] 3 separate tickets in 3 days... it seems dishonest to keep opening/closing them rather than let us know the infra is unreliable for the foreseeable future http://travaux.ovh.net/?do=details&id=49451& http://travaux.ovh.net/?do=details&id=49504& http://travaux.ovh.net/?do=details&id=49530&
edit: not sure why I got downvoted (and I don't really care that much), I just think that communication from CEO of big company after such event should be clear for everyone, not only for those directly affected.
A nice presentation would have been great, but if there is a choice, I'd rather have the CEO work on the problem than polish his presentation.
Edit: He also named some people. I don't know who they are, I can only guess they are employees, and while I don't really care personally, I think it is tasteful to name them since they did the right thing by intervening quickly and not being reckless.
Was asked for more information from a support rep. Server was auto-wiped less than an hour later.
Ended an eleven year relationship and after this fire I can't recommend them in good faith to anyone.
a 'cloud' provider should have, at the very least, multiple redundant datacenters in one availability zone.