What is the particularly damning thing about this guy, moreso than a typical politician?
The allegation that some are minors is distasteful, but the fact that he sleeps with more women than you feel comfortable with is neither here nor there when talking about how he "ruined a country".
It's depressing to see The Economist's article open by talking about his sex life. It's utterly immaterial.
His grip on the media, his lack of reforms, his policies on this that and the other, his changing the law to avoid prosecution for fraud allegation - those things matter to the story of how he "ruined Italy"; how many people he sleeps with and how righteously outraged Americans are by it? Doesn't matter.
I'm loathe to use "litmus test" type analogies, but I believe this behavior is telling.