DC Report — “Clear evidence” China is committing genocide against Uyghurs
axios.com
axios.com
To me it appears to be a recompilation of existing documents from combatants like RFA, UHRP, ASPI, Zenz and common names from the past few years. But everyone should read the source directly.
My best solution so far has been to buy used products whenever i can’t find a version that was made outside of china. But this clearly doesn’t solve the issue, since the used market would be quickly emptied if only a few more people did the same.
The fact that we are so dependent on chinese manufacturing is a problem on it’s own.
It's all one giant Wikipedia circular proof.
There is clear documentation of people used in this report changing their story multiple times over the years. Which since none of the stories are corroborated, is an issue.
But this report doesn't even look at the way the news stories are changing over time. It's to lazy to even do that.
China is not North Korea. It's not even close. Original research is not hard. But each report must be bigger than the last.
https://web.archive.org/web/20210223203303/https://moonofala...
Look at the primary sources which they cite.
The article also isn’t trying to assert that racially targeted re-education camps don’t exist - all it’s trying to do is say that the claims of violence and abuse in those camps are inconsistent.
I’m pretty uncomfortable with racially targeted re-education camps
Can't make this stuff up...
Yet the question remains: What else can any nation do about it? I lament to say that unless it starts hurting the flow of iPhones and cheap products from China, no government or corporation has an incentive to speak up and take action
> "genocide" and "crimes against humanity."
Why is this even a hard question? Tim Cook is apparently fine with using Uyghur slave labor. Why should we care about his bottom line?
Most interesting tidbit.
Newlines is funded by FairfaxU of Virginia, a private school with ~150 students and ~60 staff (read: there's external funding). Newlines Institute is also rebrand Center for Global Policy (CGP), tradename for International Institute of Islamic Thought... linked to the Muslim Brotherhood [0]. And owned by Mar-Jac, a front for SAAR Foundation, a massive source of funding of extreme terrorism whose US proxies were heavily investigated post 911, including IIIT with a couple prosecutions. Hence the rebranding. Most of their US proxies are located in Virginia, a recent of Mar-Jac investments in private schools was linked to Turkish Gulenist, which Gulf council countries has designated as terrorists... including Saudi. So the most interesting extrapolation for me is that some wealthy Saudi group(s) is interested in pushing genocide narrative via US proxies despite Saudi support for China at UN and MbS purging major funders of terrorist groups. Western MSM is whitewashing this as "Independent DC think tank". Real question is if this is Muslim extremist groups pursing their own interests through obfuscation or if they're coordinating with US intelligence, it's Virginia after all. US was willing to delist Uyghur terrorist groups, they're willing to work with OG Al Qaeda funders to destabilize.
TFW MSM using "Independent DC think tank" label for front funded by the same groups that was responsible for Al Qaeda. Desperate times for propaganda.
[0] https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2020/11/12/new-musli...