The entire article is honestly just an overly verbose, misguided, disorganized, incoherent straw man.

Geeks say classics are worthless because they're long and hard to read? Peter Thiel is out to ruin college just because it's 'elitist'? Books are no good because they're written by one person?

Give me a break -- he doesn't even bother citing anything to support his premises. These points are so laughably far from reality that no one should waste their time addressing them. It's not even worth reading this article except as an example of faulty logic and how not to write a persuasive piece.