I don't know why you are getting down voted. For what its worth I appreciate the analysis.

I kind of feel like this post shouldn't exist without the author taking the time to explain his POV better than a few bullet points on a slide. The postscript kind of goes there but its not enough IMO. What we are left with here reduces whatever his point is to a few reductive statements that probably over simplify his arguments and leave the rest of us either nodding emphatically or shaking our heads in disgust because its just generalized enough to confirm any pre-existing bias we already have. In other words this wont change any minds.

I guess the one good thing to come out of reading this is that I'll pick up that "Pattern Language" book and give it a read. Perhaps this post will gain some value in retrospect with that context.