People are attempting to create a new world so scary and different to what you know, that it seems insane and completely off base. But we know what we're doing. We know this is leading to the future of a world where artists and fans can take back and redefine ownership.

It doesn't matter what you think ownership is. We're redefining it. :)

See you on the other side.

It doesn't have connection to the content, unless it's declared that it does.

All intellectual property law works this way already. The copy you have does not have any bearing on the copy someone else has, but we created laws that link it back: you don't "own" the copy you have, and using it in certain ways is made illegal.

NFTs as they are now, without any legal protection, are still innocent, but they are bought because people want to "own" something. Since NFTs don't actually provide technological means to implement that "ownership", the next logical step is to declare it by law: "owning" an NFT gives "ownership" of the content. I hope it never comes to this.

That guy selling plots on the moon is an idiot. If he were selling NFTs for ownership of the moon he’d be a multimillionaire by now.

> It doesn't even give you ownership on anything other than a blockchain print.

I’m pretty sure my domain name NFTs give some ownership rights you are overlooking.