But those numbers are essentially cherry-picked. They include just production of energy, like falling into the furnace? Consider about externalities. Mining, shipping. Then add in environmental erosion resulting in lower lifespans around the globe. Then failure/interruptions that endanger folks during cold snaps/heat waves. That's a big one - petrochemical plants can be down 30% of the time (nuclear < 2%) leaving grids endangered.

And of course its per-terawatt deaths that are interesting, not totals. Other wise you just have (literally) a heat map!

But if you change the measure of safety to: square kilometres rendered uninhabitable, or potential to be rendered uninhabitable, for tens of thousands of years then nuclear fission is dead last and always will be.