Hacker News Reader

Comment by zelphirkalt | Hacker News Reader

OK, we can still run some user script or have a browser setting, which removes the ?757569643D2E2E267265733D31393230266F733D4D61634F53266F part for things like images. What would be the level after that?

View on HN

The endgame is that the browser is only a thin client (think VNC) and the actual website is rendered server-side.

I think for ads this might actually be an improvement (compared to no blocking). A big reason why ads continue to stink is because they always seem to be much more poorly optimized than the actual site. I'm probably being too optimistic though, they'll probably just move the slowdown to the server rather than on the client...

Then nightly releases or AB versions of pages that change the image file name, it's place in the Dom, the structure of the t tracking links, so user scripts are difficult to maintain. Or the tracking company could just develop a browser and convince 90 of internet users to use it, infiltrate the web standards committee to gain control of web features, release new features that are not standard but get widely adopted, make many websites check for user agents of browser to ensure they are using the tracking companies browser, so most other viable browsers fail, then implement their own tracking in the that browser that cannot be blocked by user Javascript, and release a whole new OS that has browsers without extensions, or the basic ability to manage the flow of your information .....

But wait, that is today! fakes shocked expression

You just have unique names for images - isn't that already used for email pixels?

ie, se09d.png

Also used sometimes for standard cache invalidation efforts so common for both nontracking purposes too.

Worst case sites will just install a middleware layer to proxy all their requests and traffic back to ad tech machine I'd imagine or install some middleware on their stack.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steganography

Think along these lines: website.com/blog/f5/babBys-first-bl0g-post-2f.html

Can you (or a computer program) answer definitively whether there's a tracking ID in that URL?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com