During Covid, a client representing 20% of my income declared bankruptcy after already waiting > 6 months for a group invoices to be paid.
They’ve offered “secured creditors” nearly full repayment, while everyone else has been offered literally 1¢ on the $1.
Businesses tend to go the other way and be more accommodating to larger customers like continuing to fulfill their orders and not taking action at, say, 90 days late.
Secured credit can be one way to resolve that without being super strict on late payments or wanting repayment of limited credit.
Here's an example: https://www.nationwide.com/business/insurance/accounts-recei...
The folks who slow pay are a paint to deal with overall I've found, so no big loss when they go. Or you don't get paid, which is even worse! And yes, they will slow pay anyone who lets them.
For someone like Alamo so adversely affected by Covid but with an otherwise (AFIACT) healthy business in non-covid times its a reasonable approach to try to get out from under-water without undue pressure from creditors.
You see Chapter 11 more around extraordinary operating circumstances, recesssions etc. Where businesses think they can get back on their feet given some time.
I've seen retail space in amazingly hot markets be empty for 5+ years now.
There's a lot of stuff that can done to reduce the costs of a lease beyond just rent reduction.
Isn't that what Dun and Bradstreet is for smallish businesses and Fitch, Moody's and S&P do for businesses issuing bonds?
Yes, not every business is in D&B, and it takes effort to get a record there, but it's not as if there isn't a commercial credit system, it's just not so engrained into everything like the consumer one.
For any sufficiently large transaction, even for a person, such as a home mortgage, there will be manual review of people's incomes and assets, just like there is for businesses.
The equity will clearly not make any money and the business does worse in the long-run which presents more risk for more junior creditors (the company can not re-invest in growth, business contracts are more onerous as you have credit risk, low morale w/ employees, etc.).[1]
But Chapter 11 is not something a company can do at anytime. You have to prove that the restructuring of the equity and debt makes sense to either (1) your shareholders and creditors or, if that fails, (2) a judge.
Additionally, employees and the board will have equity that will get cancelled or receive pennies. So if it's marginal on whether there could be equity value someday, the company is not going to do it. On the flipside, it's pretty frustrating if you can't issue stock options that will have value someday.
Overall Chapter 11 bankruptcy is a great thing for business... it allows companies to breathe again and re-invest in growth. As far as cons...obviously the equity investors and maybe some of the creditors lose a call option on their investment (not worth anything today, but could be in the future). But that call option may be compensated for in the restructuring agreement. But the biggest con IMO is that Chapter 11 is expensive, and usually bankers / lawyers make outrageous fees here.
That was a lot and sorta of scattered. But if you see "Chapter 11" bankruptcy you shouldn't always think "this business sucks" or "this business doesn't make a profit," but should put more blame on a financier somewhere who created a capital structure that wasn't sustainable.
[1] The company may also have upcoming maturities in more junior debt, and the more senior creditors don't want them to pay the principal. Liquidation preference is a good search term if you're interested in this.
Edit: Also worth noting that creditors don't always take a 0. Sometimes their debt is reinstated, sometimes they receive equity for their debt, and sometimes they receive pennies just to get them to agree (cheaper and faster for everyone to agree than to have a judge decide). All depends on the valuation of the business and where their debt sits.
That's intended as a good example (in the sense of "clear, characteristic")? I thought oil extractors were expected to hedge or buy financial instruments that ensure they'll be able to sell at a good enough price given a project's costs. And even if not, it doesn't seem accurate to call that a case of "poor performance" but rather, external factors.
Spain: “concurso de acreedores”. The business asks the Government for a way to have lenders (acreedores) restructure/redimension the debt.
This way workers can still have job in the future, assets keep their operating value...
[1] https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/bsf-osb.nsf/eng/br02052.html
[2] https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/bsf-osb.nsf/eng/br02284.html