You can argue whether such things are palatable, to be sure, but she absolutely knew and agreed up front to this.
And realize part of the enticement to accept such clauses is the entirely healthy salary that comes with it.
If you don't like how Disney operates, then vote with your wallet. That's literally the only thing companies care about, and is the only reason why she was let go in the first place.
Saying we should force companies to retain hires despite what they say online, is ridiculous.
As for right to employment, well how far can you push it. And how does that not violate white privilege principles or corporate privilege principles. We have a corporate class which holds most of the wealth and if you say anything you will lose the right to make a living. That smacks of privilege, in fact white privilege.
Only the corporate class may speak. It's not sound in any way.
If enough people speak with their wallets, then disney will follow that. It's really that simple.
You are suggesting that corporations are one monolithic entity, which is simply not true.
I have no idea what you mean here by white privilege or corporate privilege. Nobody has the right to a job. Saying dumb things online and getting consequences is applicable to everyone, because corporations only follow the money.