Proposal for an Internet Service: The Eternal Home Page (1996)
neilsloane.com
neilsloane.com
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Sloane
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On-Line_Encyclopedia_of_Intege...
Expanding beyond that (and I think more useful) are eternal digital archives such as https://www.permanent.org/ which is a non-profit that charges you per gigabyte for perpetual storage. They store copies of your data with multiple providers (AWS and Backblaze right now) and promise to transcode formats as technologies change. you can make the archives public (letting you have the "eternal home page") or private so only certain people can view or update it. The money you pay goes into an endowment and the earnings from the endowment pay the storage costs.
https://internetid.gov/personname
id -> https://mycurrentISP.com/iddata/personname
healthdata -> https://mycurrentinsurer/personname
photos -> https://apple.com/icloud/photos/personname
Whatever, but the idea is the Eternal Home Page can be mostly(only?) pointers to records and then the authentication and authorization can change and exist in the private market. The Eternal Home Page can implement some auth as well.
Setup a trust, charge/tax/fee enough to always provide the hosting and security, that's it.
For now, everyone should at least manage a personal web page of their own to keep the dream alive.
Anyway, legal and financial aspects are what will make it permanent, not technology (though it can help!).
- IPFS
- Dat (https://dat.foundation/)
- Ethereum
- Prepaying for Hosting and Domains + Archive.org
Would be curious to hear how others have gone about this.
It would be interesting if there were a service where you could pay in $5,000 worth of Ethereum for such and have it be “Unstaked” in 500 years and pay the bearers at that time, likely some would be our Transhuman AI overlords :)
Who is going to be able to view a JPEG file 500 years from now? It requires not only the data, but also all the software infrastructure to be able to interpret this data. To me it seems a stretch that all software required to view it is still usable in a century, let alone 5 centuries.
So even if you keep these home pages around "forever", it seems unlikely to me that anyone wants to invest time in transcoding everything when the world moves on to different storage formats. So what you end up might be little more than a bag of bytes? Though I guess the textual content within the HTML still has some chance of still being readable.
It will be fun times for Internet Historians in 2496 when they try to compile the historical copies of gcc, cmake, nasm and libjpeg.
It's not mentioned at all in the article though, which I found surprising. My first reaction was that I don't think storage is the only problem, maybe not even the most difficult problem.
Proposal for the Future Service: the Eternal Infinite Day (now)
A first principles approach to this would be a time machine + a cosmic simulation console. I’m not saying that the technology will be available this month but definitely sometime this year (or technically last year too) is probable.
At least it’s a non zero chance. Combine that with a long enough timeline, and the future might just become the past.
It was a site where you could write an email to your future self, that they would deliver in 20 years.
https://futureself.orange.com/
https://web.archive.org/web/20150726002333/https://futuresel...
Reminds me Star Trek TNG "The Inner Light" episode: https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0708803/
Assuming a long-term return of 3%, in exchange for a $200 one-time donation, they could afford to spend $3 a year on maintaining a page and get another $3 a year to fund their operations. Right now, that's enough for 2GB of disk and more cpu and bandwidth than will be used long-term.
The biggest costs are likely to be customer service and abuse prevention. That could sink this.
That's changed, as of 2017:
A few months ago we stopped referring to robots.txt files on U.S. government and military web sites for both crawling and displaying web pages (though we respond to removal requests sent to info@archive.org). As we have moved towards broader access it has not caused problems, which we take as a good sign. We are now looking to do this more broadly.
We see the future of web archiving relying less on robots.txt file declarations geared toward search engines, and more on representing the web as it really was, and is, from a user’s perspective.
https://teleread.org/2017/04/24/the-internet-archive-will-so...
https://blog.archive.org/2017/04/17/robots-txt-meant-for-sea...