> In your analogy, …
Going to stop you right there. I wasn’t making any analogies. I was talking in literal terms.
Going to stop you right there. I wasn’t making any analogies. I was talking in literal terms.
I was pointing out that the parts of our food supply chain that are infrastructure and the parts that are market driven are different parts. The problem with thinking that we have “market-driven infrastructure which provides food” is that the system which provides us food is partly infrastructure and partly market-driven, but that doesn’t mean that the infrastructure is market-driven. The infrastructure parts (e.g. roads) and market-driven parts (e.g. farms) are different parts.
There’s no analogy here, I’m not using analogies, drawing comparisons, or equating things.