I think your knee-jerk focus on who the president is (and denying the possibility of change) demonstrates what I was saying: the rhetoric has convinced people that it doesn't matter and it's all some national team sport. That's just not true.
Your (knee-jerk?) characterization is the opposite of what that comment is saying.
Your response: I think your knee-jerk focus on who the president is (and denying the possibility of change) demonstrates what I was saying: the rhetoric has convinced people that it doesn't matter and it's all some national team sport.
It is entirely useless for you to quote each of us without clarifying what you've misinterpreted.
"denying the possibility of change" is the opposite of what they did.