The overarching issue with normalization of censorship is that it becomes difficult to tell when evidence does not exist and when it does exist but was censored.
Please don't take the above argument too seriously, my point is that so many of the fact check orgs are riddled with logical fallacies. In this case we have guilt by association, ad hominem, argument from authority, and appeal to motive.
I think a fact check system that did not rely on logical fallacy would be quite useful, however I have yet to find one.
If you want real evidence of "irregularities" look elsewhere, its certainly not here.
Personally, I think that’s the primary reason the riot happened.
Why should I believe anything that supports trump. He said "we have the virus under control." Yea, let's believe his cronies. Give me a break.