If someone offered you 5 bucks, with the caveat that if you take it then the Earth is destroyed the moment you die - you're a terrible person if you take the money.
(Incidentally, there's not really any difference between not experiencing something because you're dead, and not experiencing it because your back is turned. Are you fine with atrocities in general, provided you don't find out about them?)
No, you would be nothing the day after you die. It is that simple.
The problem was slightly different anyway, that is everyone being wiped out at the same time. Literally no body would care anymore.
The problem I have with the "eggs in a basket" line of thinking is that it raises extreme moral hazard to say we don't have to care about everyone as long as a few people are saved. Losing a basket of billions of eggs to save a dozen is cold comfort.
(Yes, I realize magnetic pole reversal isn't the same as nuclear holocaust, but I still don't feel my scepticism is misplaced.)
Giving up the human species because zarchose will be unhappy he didn't survive the apocalypse seems a waste.
(For the record, I’m all for colonizing other locations)
Sometimes when I'm trying to doze off at night, I think about how strange our existence is. Not even the smartest people on this planet have any idea how or why the universe exists. We might never find out. We might be a simulation operated by higher beings, but that raises even more questions. Argh, what I would give to know.
Does that really matter in the grand scheme of things or is it just ego?
edit: To take it further, without some super-intelligent / supernatural beings it seems likely all structure in the universe will eventually disappear due to a heat death or a big crunch. Does even that matter?
My take is that we are just too young to have any idea what really matters in the grand scheme so the best approach is just try to survive.