I'm not sure whether this person is actually responsible for a multi-million dollar defense project, but if he really was, it's probably a good thing he lost the deal because I definitely don't want that kind of person managing such a project.
I'm not sure whether this person is actually responsible for a multi-million dollar defense project, but if he really was, it's probably a good thing he lost the deal because I definitely don't want that kind of person managing such a project.
I think its the opposite, I think its an unqualified contractor writing code he doesn't understand for complex systems and was subsequently hacked. I see this a lot with people bidding on contracts then hiring staff/developers after it's awarded to duct tape a system together that barely works and is full of holes.
An article was shared here a while ago that went into that as well: https://tim.blog/2020/02/02/reasons-to-not-become-famous/
(Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22280753)
I would take this threat very seriously.
Two words went through my head reading the response. "Crystal Meth".
Likely not, really, but having more-or-less lost an old friend to meth I can't help but compare the similarities (... the "identicalities" actually):
- the desperation and paranoia
- a solid (but wildly misplaced) basis in reality
- the overwhelming externalization of blame
- the need to lash out and draw someone else in
- the completely nonsensical evidence
Bottom line is regardless of the reason, "Al" is extremely unstable. I agree that the lesson here is to not engage these types.
can you explain this more ? I recognize some traits of these in me and siblings but we're not on meth at all.. so I find the psychological flaws interesting.
sorry about your friend too
The pattern is that in these scenarios, usually the people are quite intelligent and often accomplished. This gives them a repository of valid phrases and concepts to draw upon to breath legitimacy into their boogeymen. The evidence they present, however, is completely benign. That person, however, has quite the story they think is proven. It's literally as if they're showing you a basic electronic device w/ the cover removed and that proves all sorts of maliciousness.
Attempting to argue back is completely ineffective and even if you "win" one point, they'll quickly shift to another and nothing sticks, especially not the next time you talk to them.
I wouldn't even remotely compare this to more commonly contested topics like differing religious/political/social views, even at the extreme. This involves a visceral fear that >you< are actively being attacked, not some nefarious, shadow with a grand plan.
I have a very clear idea of what spectrum we're talking about here, but maybe it's better left unspecified to not influence too much (:
Seem like the average person to me :)
I assure you, you will quickly understand the difference.
Especially if that someone is your previously un-diagnosed friend and business partner.
Not sure what caused the original email, but the reply is just a copy/paste of various unrelated things and security incidents that the person Googled without even understanding enough about them to form a comprehensible narrative.
Which tells me they are simply trying to get a rise out of someone.
The way the grammar is constructed I would not be surprised if this came from a pre-teen.
Suggests he doesn't even comprehend that curl amounts to 'instructions to copy data'
> I lost my family, my country my friends, my home and 6 years of work trying to build a better place for posterity.
I get loosing your family / home / friends, but a country? Where did that go?
A mundane class is offered with impractical advice and they're left with no money, little skills, and spamming the internet trying to get "their contract" - and if it doesn't materialize and they go back to the boot camp to complain the scammers blame it on "curl" - see the haxx.se domain? Clearly a hax0r ruined your chance at a better life.
Gov contracting is an ecosystem on its own and those that figure out the bureaucratic hoops can survive a long time without needed much technical knowledge. Some of those individuals lose touch with what is going on outside of the defense industrial base.
So the ad is from this Al guy.