This is something unlike current solar and wind technologies. Which can't be "winterized" in the same way.
[0] https://www.power-technology.com/projects/rossislandwindfarm...
Edit: It's also worth noting that the wind turbines in Texas are producing a good amount of energy despite cold conditions there.
1. If it's not higher - it'll be at 0K since that's what absolute zero means, an absolute lack of generally useful energy.
Wait I'm not sure I'm following the plot.
This entire disaster was caused by the fact that none of the power generation in Texas is winterized. Then natural gas turbine power was suggested as an emergency fallback. Then it was brought up that natural gas had frozen in all the already existing infrastructure. You're suggesting that you simply winterize the emergency natural gas turbines?
Why don't they just winterize the normal power infrastructure?
> This is something unlike current solar and wind technologies. Which can't be "winterized" in the same way.
Solar, sure. Put some snow on it and it doesn't work. But wind works everywhere. Cold, ice, snow, doesn't matter.
I'm late reading this tab, but solar power works better in the cold and slightly better in snow once you clean the panels off - snow can be very bright, that's why you need snow goggles.