That's nothing, even after markup and multiplying it around all the shelves, consider the wages you have to pay for people to go around continuously re-stickering everything. I'm pretty sure it would pay off in under a month and reduce errors... freeing staff to do more useful things. What i'm sure will _not_ be paid off in a month is the cost of integrating it into existing pricing systems.
However I think there is a more practical reason why it's not suited to most supermarkets: they are constantly moving things around due to different products coming and going and different parts shrinking and growing, so why bother with digital labels when you have to keep physically moving them anyway.
$20 total cost per device
= $1.2m to outfit a store.
/$15 employee gross costs per hour
= 38 years of labour for one store....
Either the # SKUs would have to be lower, or the BOM smaller to justify this.
On the flipside consider the material cost of paper pricing tags, reduced risk of pricing error, ability to change pricing more rapidly, increased customer marketing/attraction.
I'd also imagine that removing this function from individual stores and centralising it would save a considerable amount of store management time.
Or maybe they are already doing that ... I said to call me paranoid.
I'm not a fan of it, but that will certainly recoup that cost much faster.
Only change the prices over night? (but unlike with employees you can reprice the entire store every night without any particular cost)
If this doesn't exist already, it will soon.
But customers are so used to confusing pricing labels you could just make the old (cheaper) price say: "Discount: $x".
Also if you hook up the change to motion detectors where you know no one is in the aisle, then you can skip it altogether.
The eventual outcome will possibly be a class action law suit and in a few years the customers can sign up to receive a gift card.
You can see similar behavior with the same company here: https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/loblaws-25-gift-card-class-...
That said, I know some people that work in the grocery industry, and my impression is that the margins are tight enough that they do the math on EVERYTHING
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loblaws
they operate with other brand names for non-superstore-sized regular grocery stores, and the T&T markets which are their own market niche: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T_%26_T_Supermarket
From observing the behavior of my local superstore it also appears they're using the eink price tags on shelf in conjunction with some sort of software for planning shelf space and inventory, so it has some value to them other than just the manual labor to change paper price tags.
Feel free to visit my website and send an email if you think you've got something that we could work together to get into some of my clients' projects. If it makes the final product more compelling I'm definitely open to it, especially if it runs on trivial drivers that a low power microcontroller can handle.
I'd basically expect a display that works with a chip like a STM32WB (wireless integrated so makes sense to pair with a low power design). https://www.st.com/content/st_com/en/products/microcontrolle...
Of course fancy people have access to Qualcomm parts, so I understand if that's what you're aiming for. But if it's suitable for a bit less fancy of microcontroller chips and has a reasonable price I'd love to replace the literal LCD displays we're still stuck on because I guess it's 1996 in the realm of equipment prototyping.
But I am by no means an EE.