> Anyone know if this has killed someone yet?
> ...Tesla and Uber have killed people but Comma hasn't...
So no then.
This is the correct answer, thank you.
> ...Tesla and Uber have killed people but Comma hasn't...
So no then.
This is the correct answer, thank you.
A sentence can be technically correct while also being actively misleading.
So we can say no deaths by comma, until proven otherwise.
Definitely not misleading.
If you can't address the argument the other person makes, it seems like the more reasonable thing to do is acknowledge that fact, rather than just ignore their point entirely.
I'm looking for straight answers, not going around points, but getting straight to them.
> ...it seems like the more reasonable thing to do is acknowledge that fact, rather than just ignore their point entirely.
The fact that Tesla and Uber has more deaths than Comma? That I can agree with.