Seems like Comma's product requires your attention through driver monitoring whereas Tesla's product is non existent in this area.
And with Uber the driver was distracted.
edit: Downvoters, i'm a bit confused here, so Tesla and Uber hasn't killed anybody then?
Anyone who uses these numbers to even imply this is safer than Tesla knows nothing about statistics. It is way too early to draw any conclusions about Comma's safety. It is also probably too early to even draw statistical conclusions about Tesla's safety.
I definitely would not consider any car with adaptive cruise control without driver monitoring, especially one that touts self driving capabilities.
> ...Tesla and Uber have killed people but Comma hasn't...
So no then.
This is the correct answer, thank you.
A sentence can be technically correct while also being actively misleading.
So we can say no deaths by comma, until proven otherwise.
Definitely not misleading.
If you can't address the argument the other person makes, it seems like the more reasonable thing to do is acknowledge that fact, rather than just ignore their point entirely.
I'm looking for straight answers, not going around points, but getting straight to them.
> ...it seems like the more reasonable thing to do is acknowledge that fact, rather than just ignore their point entirely.
The fact that Tesla and Uber has more deaths than Comma? That I can agree with.
Not excusing Tesla’s faults but the volume of Tesla’s cars on the road compared to Comma’s would probably explain the difference in statistics.
Please state your evidence on this.
Do they have a powerful driver monitoring system already?
Is it being used?
This system is very powerful indeed.
AFAIK Tesla is adding driver monitoring cameras.