> The primary aim of Pleistocene Park is to recreate the mammoth steppe (ancient taiga/tundra grasslands that were widespread in the region during the last ice age). The key concept is that animals, rather than climate, maintained that ecosystem. Reintroducing large herbivores to Siberia would then initiate a positive feedback loop promoting the reestablishment of grassland ecosystems. This argument is the basis for rewilding Pleistocene Park's landscape with megafauna that were previously abundant in the area, as evidenced by the fossil record.
> ...
> Zimov and colleagues argue for a reversed order of environmental change in the mammoth steppe. Humans, with their constantly improving technology, overhunted the large herbivores and led to their extinction and extirpation.[8][9][11][12] Without herbivores grazing and trampling over the land, mosses, shrubs and trees were able to take over and replace the grassland ecosystem.[8][9][11][12] If the grasslands were destroyed because herbivore populations were decimated by human hunting, then "it stands to reason that those landscapes can be reconstituted by the judicious return of appropriate herbivore communities."
> ...
> A secondary aim is to research the climatic effects of the expected changes in the ecosystem. Here the key concept is that some of the effects of the large herbivores, such as eradicating trees and shrubs or trampling snow, will result in a stronger cooling of the ground in the winter, leading to less thawing of permafrost during summer and thereby less emission of greenhouse gases.
Any time you see cows standing in dirt and mud - that is absolutely not what we're talking about. We're talking about the original American Bison herds of (hundred-)thousands who would move across enormous ranges taking grasses from feet to inches, and fertilizing its re-growth as they move. It makes room for accelerated growth of the grass, right when it is most nutritious and stagnant. Prairie and Savanna ecosystems are far more complex than I initially thought. The large animals are not "big lawnmowers" and it isn't "just grass" that they are working with.
The soil is a huge ecosystem of its own, and what we're experiencing globally on many fronts (climate, food security, general increased toxicity of air and water) are largely connected to soil failure from our hubris at thinking we can cultivate the green stuff on top with little understanding of what happens underneath.
We need to pump less greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere.
2. If we find a method to restore mammoths, producing large enough number of these animals will take hundreds of years
3. the meat that we do not produce in arctic, is produced in tropics at the cost of destruction of much more diverse and useful forests.
But it also doesn't need to be "intensive" and can be free range.
Bison / Buffalo
Polar - Grissly bear cross
Horses
Wolves
Arctic ( Alaska ) paper from USGS - https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70115138
For the sake of the environment, of course.
[1] https://reviverestore.org/projects/woolly-mammoth/progress/
[0] https://science.sciencemag.org/content/320/5882/1444.full
There is quite a bit of evidence for that theory... it's not completely uncontroversial, but people who have tried it in practice, i.e. raising cattle by the Voisin method or using Alan Savory's "Holistic Management" or similar approaches, usually swear by it, and theoretically it makes makes enough sense to warrant further investigation.