I think there’s just too many crypto-sceptics here, and that’s a shame because crypto solved a lot of challenges they’re talking about, and is on the rally to democratise everything financial related. Something big that many people still miss on, but with about 0.5% adoption rate we’re at the early stage of the innovators stage. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_adoption_life_cyc...
Give it a few years until we get to the early adopters and for sure the quality of content will improve. It just needs more people reading about it and adopting it.
Yes, absolutely. There's some niche topics that I happen to know a lot about, and the top stories and comments tend to be very superficial and/or plain wrong.
On the other hand, there's usually someone around to call out the inaccuracies :)
Maybe that's the case for everything else that is discussed here, but I just don't have enough domain knowledge to be able to tell...
I don't think that's anything particularly unique to HN but is simply a fundamental weakness of the "one forum for all subjects" approach that HN takes contra Reddit.