(i.e. he does humanities, but for people who use phrases like 'Nash Equilibrium' and 'prior distribution' in the pub)
His identity was only relevant because NYT was going to reveal it, so he had to quit his job and temporarily shut down his blog.
Put another way, online readers knowing his IRL name, fine. But people he worked with IRL, he preferred not to point to the online persona.
[1] https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Technological_Singu...
You’ve pasted this everywhere for nothing. It doesn’t contribute to the discussion or count as evidence for anything. It’s just a completely disconnected and irrelevant piece of trivia that you are trying to astroturf onto the discussion as though it had any credible reason to be considered relevant (it does not).