Hacker News Reader

Comment by nindalf | Hacker News Reader

I think we have to understand that Google is a large company filled with people with technical skills. These people are rewarded for contributing to open source. So they do. That's it. It is entirely possible that maybe Google employees might want a feature that others don't, but I haven't seen that evidence.

In 10 years of developing Go, I know of only 2 things that the community has disagreed on with the Go team - package management and generics. One is already fixed and the other will be in a year. Nothing I can think of wrt their contributions to Rust, Kotlin, C++, Python etc.

No one has ever articulated why it's a bad thing that Google sponsors open source development. If someone could articulate specific reasons, that'd be great. But this kind of FUD comment ("hmm, they sponsor an awful lot don't they") doesn't add much.

View on HN

This lacks nuance. You ignore the effect they have on the ecosystem as a whole. Mentioning the "Go community" and their "agreement" of Google's decisions without acknowledging this is disingenuous at best. They have already swayed and gatekept large swaths of the (web)development "community" by their decade-long dominance and no one can make an impactful, meaningful decision in that field without their implicit approval. Their dominance is felt best by the way they control the conversation i.e. what we don't talk about - i.e. the web among other things they touch sucks, continues to suck and it is going to get worse and less free and they are significant negative contributers. So yeah, I'd rather see them cut into pieces.

Your comment lacks any content. You make vague claims of "effect on the ecosystem" without mentioning what that is. Give an example. Can people not create web frameworks? Can people not create products hosted on the web? Can people not use AWS or Azure for all their computing needs?

You can't just claim "everything they touch sucks" without a single example or evidence to back it up. You look like a hater.

Whoa, please don't post in the flamewar style to HN and please don't cross into personal attack. Those things aren't allowed here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

This does not warrant them giving them a board seat just because they have cash.

Go is moot point because they control that language anyway, people have no say on it except people who work at Google.

No surprise that you cannot donate any money there.

Foundation needs money (to hire employees) and resources (server time and bandwidth) to run. Sponsors of the foundation will fund this. It's as simple as that.

Point out where this arrangement hasn't worked well. Otherwise you're just spreading FUD.

Never said I was against sponsorship, just don't put them on the board of directors, a gold/plat sponsorship without votes will do.

Examples of foundations and centers that do this are R, OCaml, Zig and Ruby. All successful.

> Point out where this arrangement hasn't worked well. Otherwise you're just spreading FUD.

W3C and DRM, do you know who voted for this and who is on the board of directors of the W3C?

If you need some time I'll wait.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com