Anger and Fear as Asian American Seniors Targeted in Bay Area Attacks
npr.org
npr.org
It might be worth mentioning reduced police presence & funding, a direct response to racial politics and protests throughout 2020. I don't think that explanation aligns with the author's worldview...
[edit for clarity: Not a fan of jumping to call things "hate crimes". Also not a fan of trying to caste a mitigating aura on violent crime by saying it is all "economically motivated", especially when that is not true of all these crimes. Double plus fan of police enforcing the law and keeping violent people locked away.]
I think this is about xenophobia and hatred towards China as a source of the coronavirus, amplified by the former president’s rhetoric about the “kung-flu” or “China virus” as he repeatedly called it.
I tend to turn to this article and the studies cited when discussing police as crime deterrent. What evidence is driving your ideas on the subject?
I’m saying that it takes a very sick and twisted state of mind to commit violence towards the elderly like this, and it isn’t “normal” crime. It takes real hatred and rage to do something like this.
Yes, robberies, theft and strongarming are way up due to less policing and particularly in SF the refusal of the DA to prosecute and when he does, he often suggests "restorative justice". The same crimes do not happen with the same per-capita number in Daly City.
Is there data to support that these are indeed racially motivated and not something else, especially due to economy and unemployment and just the fact that seniors are easy targets?
How many such muggings and incidents happened during the same period against people of other races? Was the rate of crimes against other races the same and only increased against the Asians?
That's not exactly how "Asian" works.
Secondly, I'm in the Bay Area, if that was not evident.
Third, Manju Kulkarni quoted in the article as Manju Kulkarni, executive director of the Asian Pacific Policy and Planning Council is also of Indian decent.
So, yes, I'm an Asian.
BTW, if you go to UK, people from Indian sub-continent are referred to as Asians..
Ironically, humans form only one race because our genes are in strong agreement with one another and work to reject any radical gene changes, which is likely because human population had a bottleneck in recent history [3]. We haven't had enough time to speciate; we haven't even had enough time to genetically specialize to a degree which would allow speciation to be a possibility.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sneetches_and_Other_Storie...
[1] https://arstechnica.com/science/2013/10/why-are-apes-more-ge...
[2] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-13169-3
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toba_catastrophe_theory#Geneti...
So is Russia. The objection isn't that you're calling yourself Asian but that your definition is likely different from that in the article, so using that description to associate yourself with the article can come across as misleading/wrong.
It is appalling that the commenter above had to edit their own comment based on these responses.
Because people get browner the further southwest in Asia you go, a distinction is made.
Though its most fascinating that in America only recent immigrants would be referred to as European-American, if not their by their specific ethnicity, even though the majority of the country is European-descent; they're called "white" instead. "White" is a racial caste designation, European indicates a person descends from the people in a specific place on Earth; "white" is not a place on Earth.
And yet everyone who is not white gets referred to by where they're ancestors are from
>First, you find a house and scope it out.
>Find a Chinese neighborhood, cause they don’t believe in bank accounts.
>Second, you find a crew and a driver, someone who ring the doorbell. And someone that ain’t scared to do what it do.
>Third, you pull up at the spot. Park, watch, ring the doorbell and knock.
https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2016/10/15/chinese-america...
South East Asia is markedly different to South or East Asia. It's a melting pot of both cultures + Melayu and other groups. South East Asians that descended from South Asia (Ex: Malaysian/Singaporean with Indian ancestry) mostly identifies as South East Asians. Same with people who have East Asian ancestry (Ex: mainly Chinese ancestry across SEA). The immigration happened hundreds or even thousands of years ago and some are very distinct groups and cultures from their origins due to time and separation.
Ohh man do I wish they had picked another color.
Sooner or later you realise its a cultural problem, not an economic one
Police were deployed to protect the community, but this was not until the afternoon of December 8th.
https://www.nytimes.com/1941/12/08/archives/guam-bombed-army...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Varna_(Hinduism)
Casteism = Racism + Slavery https://archive.is/mPsqz
Manju Kulkarni, executive director of the Asian Pacific Policy and Planning Council, a coalition of California community-based groups is a Brahmin;
https://www.quora.com/Which-caste-is-looting-India/answers/2...
The first headline gets outrage clicks, the second doesn't.