How about you prove your haven't stolen my Mazda? Because I believe you did stole my Mazda and it should be on you to prove innocence.
Your accusation would be very troublesome if made against individuals but for corporate lawyers its just another day at the office.
Inverting the burden of proof is listed as a logical fallacy for a reason. It is never appropriate.
The income accounting in the UK and Pakistan are the closest thing to legitimate and even then self evidently regarded as extreme by their limited adoption.